For some reason, this simple rule, easy for parents to understand, has proven difficult for three of the country’s major airlines. Those rules require that an airline allow a parent to use an approved car seat or CARES harness (the only FAA-approved child harness) if a seat has been purchased for the child and is weight-appropriate. It does not store any personal data.Over the last several months, passengers trying to fly safely with their children on three major US airlines have written to me about their attempts to do so being thwarted by airline crew members unfamiliar with federal rules regarding kid seats. The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This would further improve compliance and safety for all travelers on board. Moreover, by specifying the restraint solution, the airline can (and will) ensure staff training and familiarity. The companies submitted analysis from multiple parties highlighting the testing of the Flight Vest and its success in reducing such risks. Again, this is solved with Baby B’Air since the device is attached to the seatbelt and not directly the caregiver, which puts the infant in the exact same position with the same mobility as if they were untethered on a lap. baby papoose types) has always been a crushing event with an infant tethered to a caregiver in a rapid forward deceleration and vertical acceleration event. The issue around traditional devices on the market (e.g. The Baby B’Air Flight Vest minimizes this risk by attaching to the seat belt rather than to the adult directly. The primary FAA reason to prohibit such securing of an infant is to avoid crushing the child in a crash. If approved, Avelo would add the Baby B’Air Flight Vest to its fleet, allowing an adult to secure the infant through all phases of flight. The carrier is petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration for permission to use a novel child restraint solution on board. Eventually, mostly owing to customer frustrations, the company reverted that policy to the industry norm of allowing infants to be held by a parent during flight. When Avelo launched operations in April 2021 the carrier implemented “no lap child” standard, rooted in the philosophy of keeping all passengers safe on board. Avelo appears to be the first US commercial airline making an effort to implement that recommendation.Ĭhildren as projectiles in severe turbulence events and unusual attitudes has been, and remains, an issue with airlines and there are events we can point to where an unrestrained child was injured onboard an aircraft.
![child aviation restraint system selling child aviation restraint system selling](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/81GKka+Dr1S.png)
A child restrained with the Baby B’Air Flight Vest system, from the regulatory filingįor more than 20 years the National Transportation Safety Board has called for children under two years old to be safely restrained on board.